home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Alien Confidential Multimedia
/
Alien Confidential Multimedia (Disk 3 of 9).adf
/
MARS
/
029
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-04-22
|
3KB
|
55 lines
Subject: Face On Mars
Message-ID: <14130.2F020156@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 28 Dec 94 21:39:00 GMT
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/605 - MICAP(sm) Net, Lakewood CO
Lines: 45
> It depends on the message. I believe Dr. Mack is totally
> misleading in every way because what he is producing has
> nothing to do with him being a psychiatrist. It has
> everything to do with his spiritual belief. I can well
> understand why he is embarrassment to his profession.
First of all let me state that I am only about half way through the
book, so that caveat may come into play here. Perhaps I will change
my position radicaally when I have completed it.
Second, (and this is an interesting position for a born agin
Agnostic to take) his religious beliefs should not neccesarily be
held aagainst him, and I do not believe that it is unfair that he
touts his psychiatric expertise in the books discussions. Perhaps
he would have been more widely received had he torn apart the
possibility of extraterrestrial cause and effect and then been
dragged unwillingly to the conclussion that SOMETHING must be there.
I agree that the book was NOT about the total conversion of a
disbeliever, neither was it advocacy based on nothing but faith.
What it is so far is a rendition of a trained psychiatric observer
of a number of patients, a somewhat muted consideration of
alternatives, and more than anything else, a detailing of some
rather significant commonalities which are remarkable regardless of
their cause. (Again I reserve the right to revise and extend my
commnets upon finishing the book.) My point on this thread,
however, was not
regarding Mark, but rather the apparent dual standard here, where
someone who is biased towards an extraterrestrial explanation, by
whatever cause is held to a higher standard than those biased
againts an extraterrestrial cause, by whatever standard. (I.E. Carl
Sagan's tirades). As it is widely accepted that general disproving
a negative is tougher than proving a positive, both of these types
should still be held to the same standard. If it ain't proven, it
ain't proven but that don't mean it ain't. (Pardon my
colloquialisms.)
--
David Holm - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: David.Holm@f605.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG
======================================================================
Inquiries regarding ParaNet, or mail directed to Michael Corbin, should
be sent to: mcorbin@paranet.org. Or you can phone voice at 303-429-2654/
Michael Corbin
Director
ParaNet Information Services